AASP-MN opposes federal insurance regulations

Jan. 1, 2020
In response to federal legislative proposals which would establish a lead federal role in the regulation of insurance companies, the Alliance of Automotive Service Providers, Minnesota (AASP-MN) Collision Advisory Committee has unanimously adopted a

In response to federal legislative proposals which would establish a lead federal role in the regulation of insurance companies, the Alliance of Automotive Service Providers, Minnesota (AASP-MN) Collision Advisory Committee has unanimously adopted a position statement opposing federal regulation of the insurance industry.

The Association believes that both consumers and its members are better served by maintaining regulatory oversight and enforcement at the state level, citing the following reasons: The automotive repair industry cannot possibly muster the resources that the insurance industry has “invested” in its effort to influence federal policy.

The insurance industry is second only to the pharmaceutical/health care products industry in its lobbying expenditures for the period 1998 – YTD 2009. In 2008 alone, the insurance industry spent nearly $153 million to lobby Congress and federal agencies, according to the group.

It is much easier for repair shop representatives to get to know their state legislators than it is for them to get the time and attention of their Congressperson and U.S. Senators, the group adds. The repair industry’s chances for influencing public policy are better at the state level where it can bring a stronger grassroots campaign to bear on state policymakers.

"Mobilizing national media outlets and/or consumer organizations to become engaged in the relatively obscure nuances of insurer claims settlement practices would be a daunting task," states a recent AASP-MN release. "The repair industry can more effectively forge and maintain relationships with key media and consumer organizations at the local level."

Bringing a claim in a federal regulatory scheme would likely present a greater burden to consumers and repair shops than is the case in the current state regulatory approach. The process for investigating and addressing inappropriate claims practices is established and more readily accessible at the state level.

AASP-MN Collision Division Director, Roger Bonn, Peter’s Body Shop, St. Cloud, Minnesota, states, “While regulatory challenges certainly exist at the state level, we believe that consumers and repairers are better positioned to influence state policymakers and regulators than they would be to bring about change or participate fully in a federal regulatory scheme. Therefore, AASP-MN does not support federal regulation of the property and casualty insurance industry.”

For more information, visit www.aaspmn.org.

Sponsored Recommendations

Best Body Shop and the 360-Degree-Concept

Spanesi ‘360-Degree-Concept’ Enables Kansas Body Shop to Complete High-Quality Repairs

ADAS Applications: What They Are & What They Do

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...

Banking on Bigger Profits with a Heavy-Duty Truck Paint Booth

The addition of a heavy-duty paint booth for oversized trucks & vehicles can open the door to new or expanded service opportunities.

Boosting Your Shop's Bottom Line with an Extended Height Paint Booths

Discover how the investment in an extended-height paint booth is a game-changer for most collision shops with this Free Guide.