IGNITION POINT

Jan. 1, 2020
Should technicians and shops be certified by a state-approved apprenticeship/shop evaluation program created largely by the industry?

We're Starting Something here

Can I see your license?

Should technicians and shops be certified by a state-approved apprenticeship/shop evaluation program created largely by the industry? Can the industry achieve the respect and compensation it deserves without such a program?

BRING IN THE GOVERNMENT? NO WAY

This topic has been hotly debated in many corners. As an industry we strive for respect, as shops we struggle to survive cheap competition and as technicians we have to fix the dreaded "car that's been fixed by substandard means." The licensing of repair shops and technicians seems to be a logical solution. After all, that would put all shops and technicians on equal footing and clean up the whole mess, right?

Can you recall the three biggest lies you'll ever hear? 1. "Your check is in the mail." 2. "Your shipment is on the way." 3. "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you!"

To err is human, but if you really want it screwed up good, involve the government. It's entirely possible you'd have to deal with a bureaucrat who has not the slightest clue what the car business is all about. They'd actually have the power to close your shop or deny you the right to earn a living at the thing you know best - fixing cars. All they gotta do is suspend your license and you're done.

If we simply look at the results of government licensing in states where this has already been done, we'll see not much has changed in the way the industry really functions in those states. They have the exact same problems as the "unlicensed" states, except they have to pay (for licensing) in order to work.

In theory, it sounds like a good idea, in reality, it creates more problems than it solves. My vote is Nay. George Witt

THE INDUSTRY NEEDS IT

In general, we at the board of the ASA of Illinois and Dakota-K Auto Repair are in favor of licensing shops. We feel that it will "raise the bar" of professionalism for our industry and help to weed out the backyard mechanic. The licensing of auto repair shops should consist of proof of business and workman's comp insurance, and a local business license - where applicable. Each shop should be licensed separately. Unresolved and/or an undue amount of complaints should result in a loss of license. We might use the Better Business Bureau as a filter for this since they are set up to deal with these situations.

Our view for licensing technicians is forcing more ASE certifications along with the utilization of the apprentice programs through certified auto repair schools and programs like AYES. We believe that even certified technicians should have a minimum of 20 hours of education each year ... probably more like 40. This is the only way of keeping up with changing technology, other than studying on your own. Our goal is to encourage the schools that offer these classes to have more offerings during our slow periods.

Our concern is the bureaucracy. Will our legislators play with auto repair shop licensing as a vote-getting mechanism and hurt the industry in the process? In addition, there are laws on the books now that aren't being enforced. If that were the case with licensing, we would just have another piece of paper to fill out and another bill to pay. Joan Koebernick

Sponsored Recommendations

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...
Enhance your collision repair workflow with Autel’s IA900, a process-driven solution integrating precision alignment, bi-directional diagnostics, and ADAS calibration. Designed...
The Autel IA700 is a state-of-the-art and versatile wheel alignment pre-check and ADAS calibration system engineered for both in-shop and mobile applications...
Discover how the investment in an extended-height paint booth is a game-changer for most collision shops with this Free Guide.