Federal Circuit Declares Victory for Mitchell in IP Dispute with Audatex

Aug. 11, 2017
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a February 2016 decision invalidating all three patents in Audatex's patent infringement lawsuit asserted against Mitchell, agreeing that the Audatex patents are abstract and not inventive.

Aug. 11, 2017—The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) February 2016 decision invalidating all three patents in Audatex's patent infringement lawsuit asserted against Mitchell, agreeing that the Audatex patents are abstract and not inventive.

Audatex sued Mitchell in February 2012, alleging that Mitchell's WorkCenter software infringed three Audatex patents. The Audatex patents detailed a business process for using the internet to process insurance claims including total loss valuations.

Before the PTAB, Mitchell asserted that the Audatex patents simply use well-known technology to generate valuation reports for damaged cars, and are not directed to improving a computer's functionality.

In February 2016, the PTAB sided with Mitchell and invalidated all three Audatex patents as abstract under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice Corp. decision, in which the high court ruled that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not patent eligible. The PTAB also decided each of the claims in all three Audatex patents were both anticipated and obvious.

Audatex appealed portions of the PTAB's decision to the Federal Circuit. After receiving briefing and hearing oral arguments, on July 27, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's invalidation of all three Audatex patents.

In its written decision, the Federal Circuit fully backed Mitchell's arguments and rejected all of the appeal issues raised by Audatex:

"The proposed claims recite nothing more than the collection of information to generate a valuation report for a damaged vehicle with the aid of well-known technology," the opinion reads. "They embody an abstract idea that merely uses a computer and generic components as tools to collect these data and generate reports."

"To see the Federal Circuit affirm the PTAB's decisions so quickly after oral argument is welcome news for Mitchell," said Stephanie Kroon, senior vice president, general counsel and secretary at Mitchell. "We believed from early in the case that Audatex's claims against Mitchell had no merit and the Federal Circuit has confirmed our position. This decision is a complete victory for Mitchell."

Sponsored Recommendations

Best Body Shop and the 360-Degree-Concept

Spanesi ‘360-Degree-Concept’ Enables Kansas Body Shop to Complete High-Quality Repairs

How Fender Bender Operator of the Year, Morrow Collision Center, Achieves Their Spot-On Measurements

Learn how Fender Bender Operator of the Year, Morrison Collision Center, equipped their new collision facility with “sleek and modern” equipment and tools from Spanesi Americas...

Maximizing Throughput & Profit in Your Body Shop with a Side-Load System

Years of technological advancements and the development of efficiency boosting equipment have drastically changed the way body shops operate. In this free guide from GFS, learn...

ADAS Applications: What They Are & What They Do

Learn how ADAS utilizes sensors such as radar, sonar, lidar and cameras to perceive the world around the vehicle, and either provide critical information to the driver or take...