News

Federal Circuit Declares Victory for Mitchell in IP Dispute with Audatex

Order Reprints

Aug. 11, 2017—The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's (PTAB) February 2016 decision invalidating all three patents in Audatex's patent infringement lawsuit asserted against Mitchell, agreeing that the Audatex patents are abstract and not inventive.

Audatex sued Mitchell in February 2012, alleging that Mitchell's WorkCenter software infringed three Audatex patents. The Audatex patents detailed a business process for using the internet to process insurance claims including total loss valuations.

Before the PTAB, Mitchell asserted that the Audatex patents simply use well-known technology to generate valuation reports for damaged cars, and are not directed to improving a computer's functionality.

In February 2016, the PTAB sided with Mitchell and invalidated all three Audatex patents as abstract under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice Corp. decision, in which the high court ruled that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not patent eligible. The PTAB also decided each of the claims in all three Audatex patents were both anticipated and obvious.

Audatex appealed portions of the PTAB's decision to the Federal Circuit. After receiving briefing and hearing oral arguments, on July 27, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB's invalidation of all three Audatex patents.

In its written decision, the Federal Circuit fully backed Mitchell's arguments and rejected all of the appeal issues raised by Audatex:

"The proposed claims recite nothing more than the collection of information to generate a valuation report for a damaged vehicle with the aid of well-known technology," the opinion reads. "They embody an abstract idea that merely uses a computer and generic components as tools to collect these data and generate reports."

"To see the Federal Circuit affirm the PTAB's decisions so quickly after oral argument is welcome news for Mitchell," said Stephanie Kroon, senior vice president, general counsel and secretary at Mitchell. "We believed from early in the case that Audatex's claims against Mitchell had no merit and the Federal Circuit has confirmed our position. This decision is a complete victory for Mitchell."

 

Recommended Products

2013 FenderBender KPI Survey: Complete Report

2013 How I Work Survey: Complete Report

2014 FenderBender KPI Survey: Complete Report

Related Articles

CCC, Audatex, Mitchell Contribute to Ed. Foundation

EstimateReader.com Adds Support for Audatex

Antitrust, Steering Claims Against State Farm Move on After Federal Court Appeal

You must login or register in order to post a comment.